|
Friday, 30 June 2006
I got an email from an anonymous reader a few days ago who, after presumably reading my recent article on “pretty tables”, wanted to know if there was a way to extend the idea:
Do you know if it’s possible to change the background colour of an entire table row on a “mouseover event” without using javascript? I know how to do this using image rollovers and javascript but I’m wandering if there’s some way of doing it using CSS instead.
Read more >>
Tuesday, 27 June 2006
As part of a web redesign project, a colleague of mine wanted to redo the pages to fit 1024×768 resolution but he also wanted an alternative design to accommodate the relatively small percentage of users still stuck with 800×600 pixels. He wanted to know how to go about determening the users browser resolution, so he could present the content using the appropriate template which matches that resolution.
Read more >>
Friday, 23 June 2006
One of the most important aspects of public website design is to ensure that online information and services are accessible by all people, including those with disabilities. In Australia, the Disability Discrimination Act (1992), for instance, requires that all websites that receive federal funding be accessible to users with a disability.
Read more >>
Tuesday, 20 June 2006
Back in old days of web design, making “pretty tables” was usually achieved by nesting one table within another. By setting the background colour of the outer table a few shades darker than the inner one, you could achieve a nice “bordered” look. With the move to XHTML, this is generally considered to be poor design as it contravenes the principle that you should use CSS for the presentation and the HTML only for markup.
Read more >>
Friday, 16 June 2006
Do you work for a large company? If so, did you know that they probably already pay people to read your outgoing email?
A recent emal and content security survey conducted by Proofpoint, Inc, has revealed that the decision makers in large corporations are becoming so concerned over sensitive or embarrassing information “leaking out” to the competition, that they’re willing to spend good money on protecting their trade secrets, intellectual property and whatever strategic advantages they may have. Apparently nearly half of those organisations surveyed in the US and the UK already employ humans whose job is to read and analyse all outbound email.
So, be careful what you say in that email (including webmail), blog post or message board. Your job could be on the line.
|
